Analytics Articles

The Virtual Organization and Information Technology (Part 5/5)

Eric Torkia, MASc

Share:

Print

Rate article:

No rating
Rate this article:
No rating

 

Collaboration and TechnologyOrganizations seeking to develop a virtual business model must also be in a position to effectively implement it on a business level and on a technological level. (Venkatraman, 1994; Venkatraman & Henderson, 1993,1998).
 
One of today’s hottest IT topics is how to cheaply and effectively inter-connect processes. Collaboration emerged out of the relative cheapness and ubiquity of Internet technologies. Champy (2002) states ”E-business is a natural reaction to today’s competitive environment[i]. But e-business means a lot of things to a lot of people. In current literature, e-business has taken on several definitions over time i.e.:
 
·         Strategic approach
·         A set of enabling technologies (Porter, 2001),
 
Since technology is a critical success factor to any virtual organizing strategy, the analysis of e-business is interesting due to its business focus and its ability to flexibly and rapidly support changing business needs and requirements. In essence, e-business is a composite of the above-mentioned perspectives and whose definition can be used inter-changeably with virtual organizing because of its open technologies and collaborative strategies.

 

Inmon et al. (2001) formally define e-business as IT and Internet enabled projects that develop inexpensive, reliable and highly dynamic supply chain relationships, which ultimately improve quality and reduce inventory levels[ii]. In our definition of e-business we would like to interchange supply chain for value chain, thus taking into account all the activities that are performed by the firm to design, produce, market, deliver and support a product or service including knowledge and outsourced business processes (Porter, 1985,2001). (See Figure 14: Prominent applications of the Internet in the Value Chain, M.E. Porter, Harvard Business Review, March 2001 in Appendix A: Models and Frameworks)

 
The fundamental business rationale is not new. Before the Internet and e-business, there was EDI (Electronic Data Interchange). EDI was the solution to integrate with other organizations IT systems and was generally perceived as a technical means of connectivity rather than an approach to doing business. Given that EDI was usually proprietary and required hefty investments in IT & process integration, it had the potential of creating partner or supplier lock-in issues (Shapiro & Varian,1999; Porter, 2001). Davenport (2000) adds “EDI is sometimes described as an expensive technology, but its costs pale in comparison to the human costs of agreeing on information and process standards”. Thus suggesting significant adoption barriers and potentially why EDI was never really widely adopted within the IT community as a primary means of business and process inter-connectivity.
 
Venkatraman (1994), suggests that an organization seeking to achieve greater levels of flexibility should look at their business in terms of relationships and processes in order to refocus IT on business capability or cost reduction/quality issues. In the same article, he defines a business-oriented version of EDI called BNR - Business Network Redesign (cited below). What is interesting is that he defines BNR in the same way most organizations now define e-business. His comparison of EDI and BNR yield most of the same differences as between EDI and common e-business strategies[1] à The former is technology driven and proprietary and the latter is business driven and uses an open platform that is the Internet[2]. Given the strong business focus and cross-organizational context of BNR, we have adopted it as part of our operating definition of e-business.
 
“Articulating the strategic logic to leverage related participants in the business network to provide products and services in the marketplace; exploiting IT functionality for learning from the extended network as well as for coordination and control.” Venkatraman (1994)
 
Distinctive Characteristics
Electronic Data Interchange
E-business (BNR)
Dominant Objective
Data interchange
Interdependencies across independent organizations
Primary Domain
Technical domain; data elements
Business domain; business partners
Responsibility
IT (and IS) managers
Business managers
Management Focus
Operational; tangible
Strategic; intangible
Orientation
Collaborative advantage
Competitive advantage
Performance Assessment
Efficiency and technical standards
Effectiveness of business arrangements
Action Steps
Standardized
Unique (firm specific)
Figure 7: EDI vs e-business[3]
 
Of course, organizations’ ability to implement these strategies has been greatly facilitated by the emergence of the Internet and integrated solutions (Venkatraman & Henderson, 1998). More specifically, the Internet provided solutions to telecommunication and compatibility issues spanning heterogeneous systems through new standards like SOAP[4] , XML[5], Java, HTML, ASP, etc. which have translated in applications and solutions (a.k.a. e-business technologies) such as:
·         Web services,
·         EAI-Enterprise Application Integration,
·         ERP – Enterprise Ressource Planning and
·         Intranets/Extranets
·         Data Warehousing[6].
 
We constructed the model below to highlight the various areas where technology and enterprise relationships intersect (we will cover this model in greater detail in future posts). However, collaboration is not strictly a technological proposition. Nor is it a choice of one set of technologies versus another. It is a set of tools and systems to support organizational processes. For the purposes of this study, we define e-business initiatives as those who enable an organization to operationalize one of the vectors cited, more specifically those at an inter-organizational level requiring ERM – Enterprise Relationship Management.
 
 
The Technology Partnerz ERM Technology Framework
Source: Technology Partnerz Ltd., 2007
 
 
Again, many researchers [Champy, 2002; Inmon et al 2001; Hagel, 2003; Ash & Burn, 2001] agree that one of the key factors in ensuring e-business project success within a virtual organizing environment is to effectively identify, select and integrate the right partners – all reminiscent of the old adage “A chain is only as strong as its weakest link”. Given the increasing complexity of business offerings and the partner networks to support them, effective management of the technology  component becomes a pillar of any collaborative strategy
 


[1] E-business strategies are use interchangeably with virtual organizing strategies
[2] Also includes Virtual Private Networks and Private IP Networks
[3] Adapted from EDI vs Business Network Redesign in IT-Enabled Business Transformation: From Automation To Business Scope Redefinition, N. Venkatraman, Sloan Management Review, Winter 1994
[4] Simple Object Access Protocol
[5] Extended Markup Language
[6] For the purposes of this study, these technologies will be collectively referred to as e-business technologies.


[i] X-engineering the corporation – James Champy, Warner Books 2002
[ii] Data Warehousing for E-business – W.H. Inmon, R.H. Terdeman, Joyce Norris-Montanari and Dan Meers, Wiley 2001
 

 

Comments

Collapse Expand Comments (0)
You don't have permission to post comments.

Introduction to Tolerance Analysis (Part 1 / 13)

Aug 10 2010
36
0

Tolerance Analysis is the set of activities, the up-front design planning and coordination between many parties (suppliers & customers), that ensure manufactured physical parts fit together the way they are meant to. Knowing that dimensional variation is the enemy, design engineers need to perform Tolerance Analysis before any drill bit is brought to raw metal, before any pellets are dropped in the hopper to mold the first part. Or, as the old carpenter's adage goes: Measure twice, cut once. 'Cause once all the parts are made, it would be unpleasant to find they don't go together. Not a good thing.

Remembering to pick right learning curve

Jun 17 2010
34
0

This post presents 2 popular learning curve methods for estimating how a person or organization benefits from repeat learning.

This technique is key for the project risk analyst.

Algorithms and the New Millennium

Dr David Berlinski (2000) makes the historical observation that two great ideas have most influenced the technological progress of the Western world:

The first is the calculus, the second the algorithm. The calculus and the rich body of mathematical analysis to which it gave rise made modern science possible; but it has been the algorithm that has made possible the modern world. (Berlinski, p. xv)

Dr Berlinski concludes that:

The great era of mathematical physics is now over. The three-hundred-year effort to represent the material world in mathematical terms has exhausted itself. The understanding that it was to provide is infinitely closer than it was when Isaac Newton wrote in the late seventeenth century, but it is still infinitely far away…. The algorithm has come to occupy a central place in our imagination. It is the second great scientific idea of the West. There is no third. (Berlinski, pp. xv-xvi)

Source: Berlinski, D (2000). The Advent of the Algorithm: The 300-Year Journey from an Idea to the Computer. San Diego, CA: Harcourt.

Related Posts: Enter the Algorithm

Decision Warranties

According to Prof Ronald A Howard (1992):

Three of the warranties that I would like to have in any decision situation are that:
  1. The decision approach I am using has all the terms and concepts used so clearly defined that I know both what I am talking about and what I am saying about it;
  2. I can readily interpret the results of the approach to see clearly the implications of choosing any alternative, including of course, the best one; and
  3. The procedure used to arrive at the recommendations does not violate the rules of logic (common sense).

Plain and simple... Source: Howard, R A (1992), Heathens, Heretics, and Cults, Interfaces, 22(6), 15-27.

Collaborative modeling using predictive analytics

When building models we are often confronted with assumptions that evolve over time. In most cases it is important to capture these changes to keep our model relevant. Over the last decade, Business Intelligence solutions have created a culture of self-service IS information.  Given this democratization and decentralized access to data has created many opportunities and pitfalls for business analysts and decision-makers. We are going to outline some opportunities and pitfalls relating to shared modeling and a few strategies to get started.

This post presents the opportunities and challenges stemming from moving towards a distributed modeling paradigm in the organization. Also presented is a high-level integrated predictive/collaborative planning process.

Risk versus Uncertainty

Prof Frank H Knight (1921) proposed that "risk" is randomness with knowable probabilities, and "uncertainty" is randomness with unknowable probabilities. However, risk and uncertainty both share features with randomness. The illustration below explains the relationship of the concepts better than words...

Source: Knight, F H (2002/1921), Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Washington, DC: BeardBooks.

 

RESEARCH ARTICLES | RISK + CRYSTAL BALL + ANALYTICS