Analytics Articles

Overview and objectives of collaboration

Eric Torkia, MASc

Share:

Print

Rate article:

1.0
Rate this article:
1.0

 In this blog entry, we look at the ideas and forces shaping modern collaboration. The new success factors are presented as well as diffentent schools of thought regarding collaboration and alliances.

Outlaw journalist Hunter S. Thompson once said ”we live in fast strange times and we have to move in fast, strange ways…”

 
Tom Peters, one of the world’s most revered management thinkers, is similarly quoted as saying “Strange times require strange measures”. Ashkenas et al. (1995) put it more formally by saying that many[1] organizations were faced with a rate of change that exceeded their capability to respond and had to attempt to retool their organization in order to meet an entirely new set of criteria for success.
 
Essentially, companies are facing change and are continuously looking for ways to adapt. One solution available to companies is to adopt strategic alliance strategies in order to more effectively cope with change (Adler, 1966). According to Adler’s research, further to enabling an organization to better deal with market change, important strategic benefits can be achieved through partnering because they:
  • Enable companies to capitalize on the marketing opportunities opened up by scientific breakthroughs.
  • Cut the costs of R & D, new product development, setting up new distribution channels, and hiring and training sales staffs.
  • Provide a company with production, technical, or marketing skills that might otherwise be out of reach.
  • Stimulate synergism, particularly in achieving more customer orientation and enhancing sales appeal.
  • Assure stable, economical sources of raw materials.
  • Open new markets.
  • Create new avenues for diversification.
  • Reduce risks.
  • Stimulate executive thinking by bringing together management groups with different skills, outlooks, and values. 
     
Though the benefits might have remained relatively unchanged, the strategies to integrate with other partners have not. According to Casseres (1994), collaboration in business “is no longer confined to conventional two-company alliances, such as joint ventures or marketing accords”, they now include collaborative arrangements such as networks, clusters, constellations, or virtual corporations. Casseres further states that the “individual companies in any group differ in size and focus, but they fulfill specific roles within their group”. Moreover, he suggests that within the network or group, companies may be linked to one another through various kinds of alliances, ranging from the formality of an equity joint venture to the informality of a loose collaboration. In addition, the success factors (see below)
 

Old CSFs

 

     New CSFs

Size

-->

Speed

Role Clarity

-->

Flexibility

Specialization

-->

Integration

Control

-->

Innovation

 
E-business is perceived as a strategy to integrate partners. Numerous papers and books have been written about e-business and how this concept will change the way companies interact, characterized by rapid exchange of information within a virtual network of customers and suppliers working together to create value-added processes (Hammer, 2001; Champy, 2002; Hagel, 2003; Barnes et al., 2002; Ash & Burn, 2001).

Ward and Peppard (2002) state that business drivers are a set of critical forces for change that a business must respond to. They may represent short-term (reduction of the cost base), medium-term (increased market share), or long-term (zero-defect quality) factors that an organization must focus on to meet business objectives and satisfy critical success factors[i].
 
Even though the success factors have changed, business drivers have not. When we compare the list of business drivers [Managers’ critical business objectives and drivers when adopting collaborative technologies such as e-business.] cited by Line56 in [4], we can see that they are very similar in content and scope. However, Farrell adds that fierce competition spurs innovation in both technology or business processes[ii].
 
While Partnering is a well-established strategy, the Internet has made it much more widespread (Porter, 2001). In this regard, organizations pursue collaborative strategies (new and not so new strategies) with various partners in a quest to reap the rewards of inter-business synergies: Virtual organizing (Venkatraman & Henderson, 1998), Integrated management (Barnes et al.,2002)[iii], Management by process[iv] [v] / Business Process Re-engineering (Hammer and Champy, 1993; Harrington, 1991), X–Engineering and Inter-organizational processes (Champy, 2002; Hammer, 2001), The Learning Organization[vi] [vii] [viii] (Senge,1991; Sharkie, 2003; Roth, 2003), The Lean Enterprise[ix] (Womack and Jones, 1994), Modularity[x] (Baldwin and Clark, 1997) and Symbiotic Marketing (Adler, 1966).
 
Yet as more and more established organizations realize that they need to form alliances with their customers, partners and suppliers over the Internet, e-business integration with other organization’s systems becomes a critical issue (Ash & Burn, 2001; Porter, 2001). However, according to Kanter (1994) Integration isn’t simply a technology issue; it requires integration at many levels (Strategic, Tactical, Operational, Interpersonal and Cultural)
 
Without this holistic approach to integration, the very reliance of virtual companies on partners, suppliers and other outside companies exposes them to strategic hazards (Chesbrough and Teece, 1996). Therefore, given the multitude of business relationships that virtual organizations have to maintain in order to effectively and efficiently deliver their products and services to the customer, the key strategic tasks for managers and executives now focus on:
  • Correctly identifying and selecting compatible organizations in terms of culture, business objectives, processes and technology. (Inmon et al., 2001; Barnes et al., 2002)
     
  • Reconfiguring roles and relationships among a constellation of actors (suppliers, partners, customers) in order to mobilize the creation of value (development, improvement or distribution of innovative products and services) by new combinations of players.[xi] (Normann & Ramirez, 1993)
     
  • Integrating on a process and systems level (Champy, 2002; Venkatraman 1993
     
  • Managing the risk associated under-performing partners (Normann & Ramirez, 1993)
     
  • Enhancing and develop collaborative efforts and relationships with partners (Kanter, 1994)
     
  • Ensuring the clients and partners understand and benefit from the value created through the collaboration (Normann & Ramirez, 1993) 

 


[1] I.e. IBM, Philips, Mazda, Sony, Lloyd's of London, Volkswagen, Eastern Airlines, Pan Am, Sears, Aetna, General Motors, Digital Equipment Corporation, Westinghouse, Eastman Kodak, Citicorp, …
[2] The CSFs - critical success factors presented by Ashkenas et al. (1995) are in essence a response to the expectations of customer in the global marketplace. A more complete version of this table can be found in Figure 19 in Appendix A: Models and Frameworks
[3] Figure 2 is extracted from a Line56 survey published in 2002, 524 information technology executives were surveyed on the business drivers that most influenced e-business and web services strategy and deployment within their organizations.
[4] See Figure 16 in Appendix A: Models and Frameworks

 



[i] Strategic Planning for Information Systems – Third Edition, John Ward, Joe Peppard, John Wiley & Sons 2002
[ii] The Real New Economy, Diana Farrell, Harvard Business Review October 2003 p106
[iii] Developing a Framework to Investigate the Impact of E-commerce on the Management of Internal Business Processes, David Barnes, Matthew Hinton and Suzanne Mieczkowska, Knowledge and Process Management Volume 9 Number 3 pp 133–142 (2002)
[iv] Business Process Improvement, H. James Harrington, McGraw-Hill, 1991
[v] Reengineering the corporation – Michael Hammer & James Champy, HarperBusiness 1993
[vi] The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization, Peter M. Senge, Currency-Doubleday (1990)
[vii] Knowledge creation and its place in the development of sustainable competitive advantage, Sharkie, Rob (2003), , Journal of Knowledge ,Managemeflt, vol. 7, no.1, pp. 20-31.
[viii] Enabling knowledge creation: learning from an R&D organization, Roth, Jonas (2003), , Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 7, no.1, pp. 32-48
[ix] From Lean Production to the Lean Enterprise, James P. Womack, Daniel T. Jones, Harvard Business Review, March-April 1994
[x] Managing in an Age of Modularity, Carliss Y. Baldwin, Kim B. Clark, Harvard Business Review, September-October 1997
[xi] From Value Chain, To Value Constellation: Designing Interactive Strategy, Richard Normann, Rafael Ramirez, Harvard Business Review July-August 1993

 

Comments

Collapse Expand Comments (0)
You don't have permission to post comments.

Oracle Crystal Ball Spreadsheet Functions For Use in Microsoft Excel Models

Oracle Crystal Ball has a complete set of functions that allows a modeler to extract information from both inputs (assumptions) and outputs (forecast). Used the right way, these special Crystal Ball functions can enable a whole new level of analytics that can feed other models (or subcomponents of the major model).

Understanding these is a must for anybody who is looking to use the developer kit.

Why are analytics so important for the virtual organization? Read these quotes.

Jun 26 2013
6
0

Since the mid-1990s academics and business leaders have been striving to focus their businesses on what is profitable and either partnering or outsourcing the rest. I have assembled a long list of quotes that define what a virtual organization is and why it's different than conventional organizations. The point of looking at these quotes is to demonstrate that none of these models or definitions can adequately be achieved without some heavy analytics and integration of both IT (the wire, the boxes and now the cloud's virtual machines) and IS - Information Systems (Applications) with other stakeholder systems and processes. Up till recently it could be argued that these things can and could be done because we had the technology. But the reality is, unless you were an Amazon, e-Bay or Dell, most firms did not necessarily have the money or the know-how to invest in these types of inovations.

With the proliferation of cloud services, we are finding new and cheaper ways to do things that put these strategies in the reach of more managers and smaller organizations. Everything is game... even the phone system can be handled by the cloud. Ok, I digress, Check out the following quotes and imagine being able to pull these off without analytics.

The next posts will treat some of the tools and technologies that are available to make these business strategies viable.

Multi-Dimensional Portfolio Optimization with @RISK

Jun 28 2012
16
0

Many speak of organizational alignment, but how many tell you how to do it? Others present only the financial aspects of portfolio optimization but abstract from how this enables the organization to meets its business objectives.  We are going to present a practical method that enables organizations to quickly build and optimize a portfolio of initiatives based on multiple quantitative and qualitative dimensions: Revenue Potential, Value of Information, Financial & Operational Viability and Strategic Fit. 
                  
This webinar is going to present these approaches and how they can be combined to improve both tactical and strategic decision making. We will also cover how this approach can dramatically improve organizational focus and overall business performance.

We will discuss these topics as well as present practical models and applications using @RISK.

Reducing Project Costs and Risks with Oracle Primavera Risk Analysis

.It is a well-known fact that many projects fail to meet some or all of their objectives because some risks were either: underestimated, not quantified or unaccounted for. It is the objective of every project manager and risk analysis to ensure that the project that is delivered is the one that was expected. With the right know-how and the right tools, this can easily be achieved on projects of almost any size. We are going to present a quick primer on project risk analysis and how it can positively impact the bottom line. We are also going to show you how Primavera Risk Analysis can quickly identify risks and performance drivers that if managed correctly will enable organizations to meet or exceed project delivery expectations.

.

 

Modeling Time-Series Forecasts with @RISK


Making decisions for the future is becoming harder and harder because of the ever increasing sources and rate of uncertainty that can impact the final outcome of a project or investment. Several tools have proven instrumental in assisting managers and decision makers tackle this: Time Series Forecasting, Judgmental Forecasting and Simulation.  

This webinar is going to present these approaches and how they can be combined to improve both tactical and strategic decision making. We will also cover the role of analytics in the organization and how it has evolved over time to give participants strategies to mobilize analytics talent within the firm.  

We will discuss these topics as well as present practical models and applications using @RISK.

The Need for Speed: A performance comparison of Crystal Ball, ModelRisk, @RISK and Risk Solver


Need for SpeedA detailed comparison of the top Monte-Carlo Simulation Tools for Microsoft Excel

There are very few performance comparisons available when considering the acquisition of an Excel-based Monte Carlo solution. It is with this in mind and a bit of intellectual curiosity that we decided to evaluate Oracle Crystal Ball, Palisade @Risk, Vose ModelRisk and Frontline Risk Solver in terms of speed, accuracy and precision. We ran over 20 individual tests and 64 million trials to prepare comprehensive comparison of the top Monte-Carlo Tools.

 

Excel Simulation Show-Down Part 3: Correlating Distributions

Escel Simulation Showdown Part 3: Correlating DistributionsModeling in Excel or with any other tool for that matter is defined as the visual and/or mathematical representation of a set of relationships. Correlation is about defining the strength of a relationship. Between a model and correlation analysis, we are able to come much closer in replicating the true behavior and potential outcomes of the problem / question we are analyzing. Correlation is the bread and butter of any serious analyst seeking to analyze risk or gain insight into the future.

Given that correlation has such a big impact on the answers and analysis we are conducting, it therefore makes a lot of sense to cover how to apply correlation in the various simulation tools. Correlation is also a key tenement of time series forecasting…but that is another story.

In this article, we are going to build a simple correlated returns model using our usual suspects (Oracle Crystal Ball, Palisade @RISK , Vose ModelRisk and RiskSolver). The objective of the correlated returns model is to take into account the relationship (correlation) of how the selected asset classes move together. Does asset B go up or down when asset A goes up – and by how much? At the end of the day, correlating variables ensures your model will behave correctly and within the realm of the possible.

Copulas Vs. Correlation

Copulas and Rank Order Correlation are two ways to model and/or explain the dependence between 2 or more variables. Historically used in biology and epidemiology, copulas have gained acceptance and prominence in the financial services sector.

In this article we are going to untangle what correlation and copulas are and how they relate to each other. In order to prepare a summary overview, I had to read painfully dry material… but the results is a practical guide to understanding copulas and when you should consider them. I lay no claim to being a stats expert or mathematician… just a risk analysis professional. So my approach to this will be pragmatic. Tools used for the article and demo models are Oracle Crystal Ball 11.1.2.1. and ModelRisk Industrial 4.0

Excel Simulation Show-Down Part 2: Distribution Fitting

 

One of the cool things about professional Monte-Carlo Simulation tools is that they offer the ability to fit data. Fitting enables a modeler to condensate large data sets into representative distributions by estimating the parameters and shape of the data as well as suggest which distributions (using these estimated parameters) replicates the data set best.

Fitting data is a delicate and very math intensive process, especially when you get into larger data sets. As usual, the presence of automation has made us drop our guard on the seriousness of the process and the implications of a poorly executed fitting process/decision. The other consequence of automating distribution fitting is that the importance of sound judgment when validating and selecting fit recommendations (using the Goodness-of-fit statistics) is forsaken for blind trust in the results of a fitting tool.

Now that I have given you the caveat emptor regarding fitting, we are going to see how each tools offers the support for modelers to make the right decisions. For this reason, we have created a series of videos showing comparing how each tool is used to fit historical data to a model / spreadsheet. Our focus will be on :

The goal of this comparison is to see how each tool handles this critical modeling feature.  We have not concerned ourselves with the relative precision of fitting engines because that would lead us down a rabbit hole very quickly – particularly when you want to be empirically fair.

RESEARCH ARTICLES | RISK + CRYSTAL BALL + ANALYTICS